Skip to content

  • About IP Theory
  • Masthead
  • Recent Publications
    • The Constitution Commandeth: Thou Shalt Not Protect the Same Subject Matter Under Design Patent and Trade Dress Laws
    • A Hot Spit-Take: Why the Supreme Court Will Hold That There Is No Privacy Interest in Commercial DNA Data
    • Indian Pharmaceutical Patenting Under Section 3(D): A Model for Developing Countries
  • Volumes
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Issue 1
      • Volume 1, Issue 2
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Issue 1
      • Volume 2, Issue 2
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Issue 1
      • Volume 3, Issue 2
    • Volume 4
    • Volume 5
    • Volume 6
    • Volume 7
      • Fire of Genius: Season 1
        • Season One, Episode Zero: An Introduction
        • Season One, Episode One: Licensing with CRISPR
        • Season One, Episode Two: You Don’t Own Me
        • Season One, Episode Three: Intelligent Design
    • Volume 8
      • Fire of Genius: Season 2
        • Season 2, Episode 1: Spark of Genius, Trademarking Hashtags
        • Season 2, Episode 2: Spark of Genius, 15 U.S.C. 1052(a) & FUCT
        • Season 2, Episode 3: Spark of Genius, Trademarking Colors
        • Season 2, Episode 4: Spark of Genius, Cigarette Packaging and Trademark Rights
        • Season 2, Episode 5: Helsinn v. Teva and the America Invents Act
        • Season 2, Episode 6: Spark of Genius, A Look at Helsinn Healthcare
    • Volume 9
      • Fire of Genius, Season 3
        • Season 3, Episode 1: Spark of Genius, The Case for Nationalized Cryptocurrency (Blog Post)
        • Season 3, Episode 2: Spark of Genius, The Likely Ramifications of Capital One’s Data Breach (Blog Post)
        • Season 3, Episode 3: Spark of Genius, U.S. Films in China – Reasons for Rampant Copyright Infringement and Proposed Solutions (Blog Post)
        • Season 3, Episode 4: Spark of Genius, .COM Trademarks – Booking.com Case May Change How We View Domain Name Trademarks (Blog Post)
        • Season 3, Episode 5: Spark of Genius, Tiger TrademarKing – How IP Took Down the ‘Tiger King’ (Blog Post)
    • Volume 10
      • Fire of Genius, Season 4
        • Season 4, Episode 1: Journal Video Series, A Conversation with Dr. Antara Dutta of Amazon
    • Volume 11
      • Interview With David Gindler, Partner, Milbank LLP, and Jasper Tran, Associate, Milbank LLP
    • Volume 12
      • Fire of Genius, Season Five
  • Fire of Genius
  • Contact
  • Alumni
  • LinkedIn
  • Spotify
  • Apple Podcasts
  • Google Podcasts
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Search IP Theory

Archives

  • March 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • April 2022
  • December 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016

Will Gene Patents Impede Whole Genome Sequencing?: Deconstructing the Myth that 20% of the Human Genome Is Patented

by Christopher M. Holman, University of Missouri-Kansas City

from Volume 2, Issue 1 (Winter, 2016)

Download this Article in PDF format from The Jerome Hall Law Library’s Digital Repository.

Posted on October 1, 2016September 11, 2017Author adminCategories Volume 2, Issue 1

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Cultural Cognition of Patents
Next Next post: Vernor V. Autodesk: Power to the . . . Producers?
Proudly powered by WordPress